NotPoliticallyCorrect

Home » Race Realism » Just-so Stories: Christianity

Just-so Stories: Christianity

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 195 other followers

Follow me on Twitter

Charles Darwin

Denis Noble

JP Rushton

Richard Lynn

L:inda Gottfredson

Goodreads

Advertisements

1200 words

Storytelling in religions is ubiquitous. Storytelling can be found in all religions for myriad reasons, including—but not limited to—(1) the passing of traditions; (2) how the mores of the society in question should be structured (Wuthnow, 2011); (3) bringing people into the religion by creating origin myths, and so on. In short, the function of religious storytelling has numerous primary directives, but one of the most important is answering why questions (Braustein, 2012) (i.e., “Why are we here?”, “Why do we do X?”), not how questions (i.e., “How did we get here?”). Thus, the importance of religious storytelling seems to be obvious: religious storytelling serves its function in virtue of explaining why questions which were formulated by a human mind. It also, for billions of people around the world, grounds morality in an objective reality given to Man by God.

If religious storytelling can answer how questions, then, it is proposed, we can believe these stories as evidence that the religions in question are true. However, there is much pushback in believing these religious stories. Religious stories are what can be termed “just-so stories”, which amount to hypotheses which offer “little in the way of independent evidence to suggest that it is actually true” (Law, 2016). It is for this reason that we cannot—nor should we—accept any religious just-so stories: they lack sufficient evidence for belief, other than what they purport to explain. In this article, I will discuss certain just-so stories and Christianity—how they fail to successfully argue what they purport to but still serve important (moralistic) functions. Religion and language/writing are deeply intertwined, and so, understanding how and why we speak and write along with the history of civilization will help us to better understand how and why we tell these kinds of stories.

Religion has been around as long as agriculture (Peoples, Duda, and Marlowe, 2016), and so, if we understand the co-evolution of both of these variables, then we may understand how and why these types of stories have persisted through the ages. Storytelling—in a religious manner—is a way to ground a certain group’s morals in something objective. This is one very important reason that religious storytelling has persisted. For example, Christians argue that Jesus rose from the dead in 3 days and that God created the universe we live in, and so on. These two claims, though, are just-so stories since there is no independent evidence for the claims. There are other more important functions to Christian storytelling other than believing in the ultimate truths of the purported claims.

Stories have many functions—one of the many functions is to give purpose to one’s life. Yet another function is to guide how one lives their lives using stories that were created thousands of years ago. Storytelling in Christianity is a large topic—one that is held dear to many people. What are some of the stories and are there any independent reasons to believe them?

Creationists—those who believe that a Supreme Being created everything we see around us—use the Bible and its stories as evidence that evolution is false and Creationism is true. One prominent Creationist is Dr. Bo Kirkwood who wrote The Evolution Delusion: A Scientific Study of Creation and Evolution (Kirkwood, 2016). In the book, he attempts to use Christian storytelling to attempt to discredit the fact of evolution. He makes many questionable claims including “God’s fingerprints are seen by observing his finely tuned universe” (Kirkwood, 2016: 210). This is a perfect example of a just-so story—make a claim that has no evidence to support it, the only evidence to support it is the claim (that “God’s fingerprints are seen by observing his finely tuned universe”).

No evidence exists that the universe is “God’s fingerprints … finely tuned” the universe, and so it is a just-so story. The arguments pushed by Creationists such as Kirkwood (2016) do not make any testable predictions. The Big Bang theory, however, does make testable predictions and is, therefore, not a just-so story. Note how Kirkwood’s (2016) claim have no independent evidence to back them—that God “finely tuned” the universe is one of the ultimate just-so stories. It’s literally based off of faith and no evidence. Nothing can falsify the claim that God “finely tuned” the universe, and so we should disregard claims like this from Creationists. Kirkwood’s (2016) claims that the universe is “finely tuned” by God is an attempt to argue that there is a Creator of the universe we live in, and so we should dispense with evolutionary thinking and embrace the Creator, God. Kirkwood (2016) believes that, if evolutionary theory can be disproven by appealing to claims that God “finely tuned” the universe, then more people would believe God’s Word and society would start trending in a more religious, Christian trajectory.

Just because claims from Creationists are false does not mean that religious storytelling has no use—no function—in the modern day (or even thousands of years ago when they were first formulated) One of the most important functions for storytelling in Christianity is the grounding of objective morality. Most of the stories told in the Bible have a moralistic message that it wants to convey. Do this, not that, because God is watching and this objective morality is grounded by God. These stories, then, got passed down through each successive generation and eventually became got sorted into what is now the Bible during the Council of Nicaea.

One of the best examples of morality in the Bible—and the stories that accompany it—is Romans 13: 8-10, where it is stated that, many of the Commandments can be summed up succinctly as “Love does no harm to a neighbor. Therefore, love is the fulfillment of the law” (New International Version). The Ten Commandments were given to Moses by God – they were given to Moses to give to the Israelites in order to guide them to live good, moral lives. So, if “… whoever loves others has fulfilled the law” (New International Version), and those who follow the Ten Commandments have fulfilled the law by loving—not harming—their neighbors, then those who follow the story that Moses was given the Commandments by God are living a moral life and therefore these stories help people in our societies live moral lives. That these stories help billions of Christians live moral lives does not speak to the truth of the claim that these Commandments were given to Moses by God, though. That is irrelevant. The most important thing here is that these stories help others live moral lives. (Quite obviously, the stories are not sufficient to live a moral life, since there are non-religious people who do so.)

Religious storytelling—irrespective of the truth of the stories—is clearly important in our societies. They help people with certain moral quandaries, to live their lives a certain way because they believe that someone is watching them. If these stories help people live good, moral lives, then it does not matter if the ultimate claims of the stories are true or not. Therefore, Christian storytelling has very important functions for how our current societies function which is why Christian storytelling has persisted through the ages, even if the claims are false.

Advertisements

12 Comments

  1. Samu says:

    What arguments/evidence should be provided for you in order to convert you to Christianity?

    t. an Orthodox Christian

    Liked by 1 person

    • RaceRealist says:

      Let’s start with just one: Refute the problem of evil. Quote from Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy:

      P1. God is omnipotent, omniscent, and morally perfect.
      P2. If God is omnipotent, then God has the power to eliminate all evil.
      C1. God has the power to eliminate all evil (modus ponens, P1, P2)
      P3. If God is omniscent, then God knows evil exists.
      C2. God knows evil exists (modus ponens, P1 P3).
      P4. If God is morally perfect, then God has the desire to eliminate all evil.
      C3. God has the desire to eliminate all evil (modus ponens, P1, P4).
      P5. Evil exists.
      P6. If evil exists, then either God doesn’t have the power to eliminate all evil or doesn’t know evil exists or doesn’t have the desire to eliminate all evil.
      C4. God doesn’t have the power to eliminate all evil or doesn’t know evil exists or doesn’t have the desire to eliminate all evil (modus ponens, P5, P6).
      P7. If God doesn’t have the power to eliminate all evil or doesn’t know evil exists or doesn’t have the desire to eliminate all evil, then God does not exist.
      C5. God does not exist (modus ponens, P7, C4).

      Liked by 1 person

    • dealwithit says:

      the “problem of evil” isn’t a problem you fucking retarded guido.

      rr is a traitor to the roman empire.

      whatever shit one may endure is a “drop in the bucket” compared to eternal life.

      try harder muzhik!

      embrace the truly GREAT tradition of your own people.

      you seem like a sincere person…

      read the new testament beginning to end…every word…then report.

      Like

    • RaceRealist says:

      Why is it not a problem?

      Like

  2. dealwithit says:

    “little in the way of independent evidence to suggest that it is actually true”

    depends on what one counts as “true” retardo montalban.

    rr has made an idol of the world…as many do.

    he needs to read this and stop his tedious jving.

    https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1298438455i/92307.UY630_SR1200,630.jpg

    Like

  3. dealwithit says:

    what a piece of shit.
    /
    one last time muzhek.

    rr is going through the same phase i went through when i was 9.

    read it and weep.

    i have herpes.

    Like

  4. dealwithit says:

    the above is the single most autistic thing rr has ever written.

    it’s sad how some people never mature past the 4th grade.

    Like

  5. dealwithit says:

    the REVELATION of the jews is that MORALITY is REAL…

    before the jews, deities were just personifications of phenomena.

    but ancient judaism has no “independent verification”…because rr’s theory of truth (for which he has ZERO evidence) excludes ALL moral claims as such.

    rr’s religion is idol worship.

    when the apostles tell you he rose…what more do you want?

    does rr think OJ is innocent?

    the evidence of the resurrection is as good as the evidence for any ancient event.

    but rr is right that people must tell themselves stories…but some stories are better than others and there is one story which is the best…all other stories are inferior.

    that story is The Greatest Story Ever Told.

    Like

    • kn83 says:

      The idea of Objective Morality is not unique to, nor originated from the Jews. In fact, it hardly even exist in the Old Testament/Torah (which only real standard of morality is clannish self-interest).

      Like

  6. dealwithit says:

    a tertullian said in so many words…

    christianity is just way too weird to have been made up.

    credo quia impossibile est.

    Like

  7. dealwithit says:

    if you’d like an explanation of why christianity is the best just-so story possible you might read the following (just ignore the medieval bullshit):

    christianity was likely just another jewish money making scheme, but that doesn’t actually matter.

    as pope benedict said all other religions are gravely deficient.

    you also might listen to gregorian chant and look into carthusian spirituality.

    38So in the present case I advise you: Leave these men alone. Let them go! For if their purpose or endeavor is of human origin, it will fail. 39But if it is from God, you will not be able to stop them. You may even find yourselves fighting against God.”

    nothing succeeds like success.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Please keep comments on topic.

Jean Baptiste Lamarck

Eva Jablonka

Charles Murray

Arthur Jensen

Blog Stats

  • 524,116 hits
Follow NotPoliticallyCorrect on WordPress.com

suggestions, praises, criticisms

If you have any suggestions for future posts, criticisms or praises for me, email me at RaceRealist88@gmail.com
%d bloggers like this: