There is an epidemic: Down low bruthas. Down low bruthas spread diseases in all of the populations, which also spread them in our normal populations. Because black culture is “manly”, this forces a lot of those gay blacks to be down low. They then have secret relationships with men, who they then get diseases such as AIDS from, then pass it on to their wives or partners. When they lead these secret lives and don’t inform their partners about their real preferences, this then causes these degenerate diseases to come into our populations, and unknowing people may then become infected due to no previous knowledge that the individual has a disease.
A Gallup poll from 2012 shows that blacks represent the biggest part of the ‘LGBT’ community, with 4.6 percent of black Americans identifying with the label. Also noted, was that 4.2 percent of ‘Hispanics’, 4.3 percent of Asians and 3.2 percent of Caucasians identified as ‘LGBT’. They also say that poverty is involved:
the LGBT population has a larger proportion of non-white people and clearly is not overly wealthy,
We know that their IQs are innate and that when black and ‘Latino’ IQs are matched at 100, many racial differences disappear. So we can say, with reason, that if a black or ‘Latino’ is poor, they have a higher chance of being gay than whites.
This phenomenon has been noted in the recent years, and many are not telling their wives, which is having diseases slip into the normal population. Black males are over-represented in all STD cases around the country. “African Americans comprised approximately 6 percent of the population in CA, but represented about 19 percent of chlamydia cases and 28 percent of gonorrhea cases in CA.African American chlamydia rates were more than 5 times higher than those of non-Latino whites. African American gonorrhea rates were more than 6 times higher than those of non-Latino whites. African Americans had more cases of AIDS and syphilis, which affect predominately gay men and other men who have sex with men, than would be expected, based on their population size.These disparities are evident throughout most of the state, regardless of geographical location.” This is due to them not using condoms. OIder black men with HIV have sex more without condoms, which is yet another way these diseases get spread.
A number of blacks who go to prison come out gay. This is proof that it’s environmental, a choice, and not genetic. A meta-study was done on homosexuality, looking over 10,000 papers from 20 years and from both sides of the debate. What was found was, that homosexuality doesn’t have a genetic component, that significant environmental factors are attributed to homosexuality. Twin studies prove that it is environmental, seeing as identical twins share 100 percent of their genes, then if homosexuality were genetic, both twins would be gay 100 percent of the time. This is not the case, seeing as both twins are gay only 11 to 14 percent of the time. Quite the blow to the genetic hypothesis of homosexuality. Seeing as there is no ‘gay gene’, we can pretty much rule out a genetic hypothesis.
Blacks high rate of sexual encounters continues in prison as well. Even when confined to prison, their testosterone still urges them to fulfill their desires, and if there are no white women around to rape/sexually assault, they then do the same to the prisoners on the inside.
Then when they get released, these diseases then come out into the normal population due to the person not telling their wife or girlfriend of their escapades in prison.
“Bruthas” become down low because, in black “culture”, it’s seen as non-masculine to be gay (funny, seeing as they have the highest chance to be gay). Blacks contribute to the proliferation of diseases in two ways: a) by being down low bruthas and b) by sleeping with white women who then unknowingly spread diseases to the white population.
Rushton observed that skin melanin is highly correlated with many variables, HIV/AIDS included. This same pattern continues in America, showing that it’s not only environmental factors that lead to these diseases but that their promiscuity is genetic, as discussed in Race, Evolution and Behavior:
Testosterone may order many of the racial differences, for it has been related to self-concept, temperament, sexuality, aggression, and altruism, in women as well as in men (Baucom, Besch, & Callahan, 1985; Dabbs, Ruback, Frady, Hopper, & Sgoutas, 1988). In a study of 4,462 U.S. male veterans, where extensive archival records were available, Dabbs and Morris (1990) found testosterone correlated with reports of childhood delinquency, adult delinquency, drug use, alcohol abuse, military misconduct, and having many sex partners. Testosterone is also involved in the development of secondary sexual characteristics such as muscularity and depth of voice (Haeberle, 1978; Hudson & Holbrook, 1982) as well as the organization and structure of the brain. (p. 271)
Since these same factors exist anywhere blacks are in the world, as I have spoken about many times before, we chose our environment based on our genetics. Since blacks anywhere in the world have these high rates of disease, it’s obviously due to their sexual promiscuity. Being down low bruthas then further spreads it into the population.
***Always ask a man or woman you speak to if they have ever been with a black man or woman.*** Doing so could save your life as well as many other horrible implications from diseases. Seeing as those with higher IQs can better control sexual urges than those with lower IQs, and those with higher testosterone landed in prison more often, we can see this direct link in regards to testosterone in both IQ and ability to control sexual urges as well as those with higher testosterone going to prison more for crimes of sexual assault and rape.
Down low bruthas are yet another scourge we have to deal with. If it’s not blacks committing crimes, it’s blacks and their other deviant behaviors that then seep into our normal populations due to them not saying what they do on their spare time.
Always pre-screen partners for sex with blacks!!
”A Gallup poll from 2012 shows that blacks represent the biggest part of the ‘LGBT’ community, with 4.6 percent of black Americans identifying with the label. Also noted, was that 4.2 percent of ‘Hispanics’, 4.3 percent of Asians and 3.2 percent of Caucasians identified as ‘LGBT’.”
Sorry but i think this part is innacurate.
Proportionally speaking seems the % of homossexuals is similar among ethnic groups in USA.
But the percent of homossexuals who are white are much higher than blacks because we have 180 million of white americans and 40 million of black americans.
4% of 180 million is no the same than 4% of 40 millions.
Blacks are not biggest part of LGBT community.
”We know that their IQs are innate and that when black and ‘Latino’ IQs are matched at 100, many racial differences disappear. So we can say, with reason, that if a black or ‘Latino’ is poor, they have a higher chance of being gay than whites”
Homossexuality is a mutation that tend to happen in the extremes of a bell curve.
Black and latinos seems no have higher chance to being gay, they tend to be more sexually promiscuous than whites and east asians, it’s true, but sexuality spectrum or diversity is something that is universal and is depend on both environmental (cultural and seletive pressures) and genetic.
American jews seems have greater % of homossexuals, why you explain it to me*
Well in terms of Jews, as well as the rest, I like the gay germ theory.
I made a good case for an environmental cause, a choice, for homosexuality. So many blacks go to prison, and to still fulfill their sexual urges they then turn to prison rape.
Also, blacks are the biggest part percentage wise according to the poll. Do you know of any other polls showing a percentage breakdown by race in regards to homosexuality?
Sure whites have the bigger numbers as whites are the majority, but in terms of percentage in regards to population, blacks make up the most of the LGBT community.
And Greg Cochran responded to the bell curve analogy you used:
Source is from the Peter Frost article.
You like this theory, doesn’t mean that is right.
the theory create a atmosphere of exclusion of homossexuality condition, ”falling apart”, but sexuality is a continuum where we have all palette of types, all colors.
Masculine homossexuals are very like as feminine men and lesbians as masculine women and will have the types who will be less significantly explicit their androgyny. No more mystery about it.
Modern man tend to be less ”masculine” than pre-historical man.
The case for mental illness and heterozygosis of them that is very correlated with creativity.
mental illness= pathogenic conditions
creativity (1/3, 1/2, etc of mental illness) = ”genetics” ****
the biological prejudice
when some trait is bad (for them) people labelled as pathogenic
when some trait is good (for them) people labelled as genetic, normal.
Type II Diabetes is environmental, it’s brought on by diet. Too many insulin spikes leads to Type II.
I don’t discount that SOME gays can be born that way, just a huge majority make the choice to be gay.
The gay germ theory makes a lot of sense as well in my opinion.
We also don’t know why women turn gay, this is about gay men. The causes for women are, as of now, unknown.
So if men who have sex with men aren’t homosexual what are they? Are they bisexual? I don’t think that exists. See, giving all of these groups special victim status and special names has led to some of the problems we face today. We should stop coddling these people, for the betterment of the country.
Folding to the gay marriage rule was ridiculous. Now we have people wanting to use the opposite sex bathrooms… For what? It’s ridiculous.
It’s also worth noting that the gay lobby lobbied so hard to have homosexuality taken out of the DSM III. That’s very telling in and of itself.
About your points on traits being good or bad, I agree. It comes down to differing societal norms and what they see as normal.
I know that just because I like the theory doesn’t make it true, but it’s a good case for homosexuality in men.
Modern man is less masculine than prehistoric man because the way our societies are set up, those nonviolent men would have been culled from the population.
In modern society, that doesn’t happen.
”Normal” people love to lies about their intimacy. They doing this all the time. Lies is a common place in human societies.
Men are very pragmatic about sexuality, men tend to be more pragmatic than women. they can separate sex from love and make sex with other men without love them.
Prisons and other closed places with higher density of (promiscuous) men and higher % of homossexuality explain partially what is intrinsic to the masculine nature.
”Sure whites have the bigger numbers as whites are the majority, but in terms of percentage in regards to population, blacks make up the most of the LGBT community”
the differences is insignificant
you said that ”blacks represent huge part of american lgbt community”
in real numbers, real world**
no, because they are a demographic minority,
Right. But prison sex is a choice more often than not. And from the data I sourced, I’m sure I made a good case for, atleast black homosexuality.
You’re right about that. But you’re more likely to see a gay minority than a gay white, all things considered, due to the percentage of the minority population that is gay. Yea more whites are gay, but you’re more likely to see a gay minority.
Also heritabilities for homosexuality are as low as 11 percent and as high as, according to Cochran, 25 percent. Pretty damn low heritabilities. Twin studies put it at 11 to 13 percent and 20 percent that both twins are gay.
If it were genetic, why is the heritability not substantially higher?
Most part of american homossexuals live in urban areas which are highly populated by black populations, that is a statistical impression.
White americans are more sparsed throghout american territory.
2% of (positive) heritability still relevant.
Heritability is not static in the space and time and maybe this lower heritability of homossexuality among twins can be just what human nature were evolved.
Schizophrenia is also highly heritable and seems have pathogenic/mutational component.
Left handedness have 25% of twins concordance, so*
how people inherit new mutations**
what is mutation if not ”pathogen”**
there is a theory about sexuality where the simple sexual desire, hetero or homo, have pathogenic nature.
sorry, schizophrenia (also) highly heritable.
External pathogenic vector may (generally) can change behavior, not brain-type and physiological androgyny, sorry.
I did not get influenza and turned gay, sorry.
You already hear about the correlation about newest son (of a brothers) and homossexuality*
Negroman is extremely dishonest man, at sociopathic levels
don’t be gullible,
many hbds are like him
These people can be extremely nasty
very careful with them
you are not dealing with a leftist retarded, it is much worse,
because you are dealing with foxes who know what they are doing. In other words, they tend to have full awareness of what they are doing. It is much more serious in moral terms (general *) than being just a ‘well-intentioned’ ‘ demented on the left.
You are not dealing with people who are governed by their emotions and therefore they tend to be sincere or that because of this type of personality always end up revealing their hidden agenda, if they had.
You are dealing with extremely cold people who are able to lie to you, face to face.
I have the impression that you think ‘hbb’ ‘is an ally of the white cause. Do not believe it.
I would not doubt if they were more an octopus arm, but with large doses of chutzpah, cynicism led to extreme levels.
I do not trust anonymous. The natural right to anonymity is total, but it is a perfect place to the foxes dress as a sheep.
”A number of blacks who go to prison come out gay. This is proof that it’s environmental, a choice, and not genetic”
there are accute and constant behavior, we born with them,
others will be more dependent on environmental conditions AND genetics of people.
Some people born with diabetes type 1, inborn condition,
others will be more predisposed to become diabetic, diabetes type 2, a predisposed condition.
some people born that way
others born with predisposition to become that way
a lot of men who have sex with other men are not homossexual,
this binary thinking is necessary to macro-comparisons
and useless when this categorizations become more specific.
”Type II Diabetes is environmental, it’s brought on by diet. Too many insulin spikes leads to Type II.”
Diabetes II is not totally environmental.
”I don’t discount that SOME gays can be born that way, just a huge majority make the choice to be gay.”
”The gay germ theory makes a lot of sense as well in my opinion.”
Because all behavioral traits are heritable**
Or because twin heritability**
”We also don’t know why women turn gay, this is about gay men. The causes for women are, as of now, unknown.”
I know why. Is very obvious to look specially the more explicity types.
”So if men who have sex with men aren’t homosexual what are they? Are they bisexual? I don’t think that exists. See, giving all of these groups special victim status and special names has led to some of the problems we face today. We should stop coddling these people, for the betterment of the country.”
Why most part of white men are intellectually stupid*
Men who have sex with other men without to be passive, is very possible to be predominantly heterossexual.
”Folding to the gay marriage rule was ridiculous. Now we have people wanting to use the opposite sex bathrooms… For what? It’s ridiculous.”
Get out of your bubble and try understand why.
”It’s also worth noting that the gay lobby lobbied so hard to have homosexuality taken out of the DSM III. That’s very telling in and of itself.”
Separate idiots than serious stuff.
”About your points on traits being good or bad, I agree. It comes down to differing societal norms and what they see as normal.”
”I know that just because I like the theory doesn’t make it true, but it’s a good case for homosexuality in men.”
[…] being in good health is yet another reason why blacks get deferred. This is due in part to “down-low bruthas” who are more likely to have diseases, and therefore cannot donate blood or plasma. Since […]
I lived in DC for 4 years and spent a lot of time around black people. I came to realize people see black guys as super-manly because their main exposure is through the apex alphas in sports and entertainment. When you get to know them, lots of them are pudgy, unathletic in the extreme, sexless, or gay. It’s a necessary trait of a hypergamous society that most of the guys lose out in the sexual game.
Blacks are weird. They are more likely to be gay (which is strongly due to environmental factors with the heritability of homosexuality being .11 to .22). It’s something in their environment, and since most poor people are more likely to be gay in comparison to richer people, it’s something in their immediate (poor) environment.
From my experience with blacks they’re much more aggressive, especially with more people around (testosterone increases in aggressive situations).
Put it like this. Children exposed to BPA in vitro are more likely to be obese. Men exposed to BPA start becoming effeminate.
The above Figure (7) is taken from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Food Surveys Research Group study on differences in drinking tap and bottled water in different populations in the country. As you can see in this figure (what is notable is the ages 12-19 and 20 to 60 in the table), whites at all age groups drink more tap water. Blacks and ‘Hispanics’ were pretty much even in consumption of bottled water. However, Mexican American girls, like black girls, are also entering puberty earlier. Since both populations have a substantial percentage of them overweight and obese (factor for serum leptin production which then causes early onset puberty), this again shows a strong correlation between body fat gain and early onset puberty. Moreover, this also shows that both Dominican and black populations consume more bottled water than do white populations, both populations are more likely to be obese or overweight (even after controlling for SES) which causes leptin production earlier causing periods to happen much sooner than in populations who drink less bottled water and use other products with BPA in them.
So they are exposed to more BPA through bottled water. They are also more likely to be gay. Poor people drink bottled water more. So you can see the link starting to become clear.
BPA is one of the main factors. BPA makes men effeminate. Blacks are more likely to be gay, specifically poor blacks and Asians. So it seems to show that there is something in the poor environment making people homosexual. But what? What’s the cause?
Dealing with blacks I’ve learned concepts like trustworthiness, conscientiousness, work-ethic, and honor are kind of hard for them to grasp. And even the ones I’ve been friendly with are only loyal to their race(as much as they can be loyal to anything) and don’t want to have a beer when we’re off the job. They don’t quite grasp the action-over-words system of stable alliances that makes a more sophisticated society possible. Hustling and charm only goes so far. They’re often verbally loquacious and fun to talk to but the last people you’d ever count on to have your back in a fight.
With indios, mestizos, blacks, I always figured it was the pre-centrally civilized genes that made them more predisposed to storing fat, gorging in times of plenty, diabetes, and addictive behaviors of any kind.
Pacific Islanders, Aborigines, less civilized people everywhere have the same problems.
I figure the preponderance of phytoestrogenic soy byproducts in junk food plays a huge role as does excitotoxins like MSG and the excess high fructose corn syrup in everything.
Consider with blacks it’s not bottled water. They drink huge quantities of sweet tea and every fruit flavor of soda you can imagine, anything grape flavored. Blacks have an enormous sweet tooth. But similarly, Southwest American Indians wolf down huge quantities of sugar-coated fry bread.
These are correlated with IQ.
Black rappers must have extraordinary verbal IQs. I’ve even noticed that normal blacks are pretty good with words and “cracking jokes” on people. Blacks jump when in great numbers. I’ve seen numerous people say that blacks don’t know how to fight and only can win by jumping people but I’ve had numerous fights with blacks and they all could fight.
No. I get where you’re coming from. But for instance, blacks eat less fiber. Knowing this, they eat more refined foods. The Alternative Hypothesis has a 3 year old video (was deleted last I checked) where they say they’ve “figured out Gary Taubes’s carbohydrate theory of insulin and obesity“. (See comments for discussion.) They didn’t falsify anything!! There is no racial or ethnic differences in carbohydrate digestion. Just pseudo-science and cherry picking. They cite East Asian rice eaters and say they eat Insulinigenic foods like white rice. However the overall diet quality is what matters and not one aspect of the diet. Moreover, obesity rates are skyrocketing in China and by 2050 they will have the most obese children in the world. Such protection from diabesity! Their hypothesis is falsified. They claim that East Asians are “more resistant” to carbs. This is ridiculous. It’s clear they have no understanding of nutrition and what insulin and things like that do in the body.
Blacks eat less fiber. Hispanics eat more processed food. Fiber protects against diabesity. There is a good relationship there. It’s pseudo-science and cherry picking to come to his conclusion he already had. He should learn some nutrition science because that video sucked.
More written here.
Ethnic Differences in Sleep, Obesity, and Metabolic Syndromes
Race, Obesity, Poverty, and IQ
Ethnicity and Obesity Rates
Yes. Look at the Pima. Once they adopted our diets, diabesity exploded in their populations. People may say that whites are “mow immune” to the effects of high insulin, but they eat a higher fat diet. People who are clueless to nutrition science shouldn’t write about it. I cringed watching the whole video because it was so damn wrong.
Well they do drink a lot out of bottles, from anecdotal experience. Bottled water, BPA, feminization. Homosexuality. It’s worth looking in to. It’s just ease of food and cheap, highly processed and highly Insulinigenic foods that cause this. No one population is “more or less resistant to insulin” than another. That’s ridiculous.